Tuesday, February 07, 2012

The Difference Between an Amateur, Freelance, and Professional Photographer

by Sean Farmer

I’m a professional photographer, with the equipment, studio, and taxes to prove it. I wasn’t always a professional photographer, however. Once upon a time I was an amateur/hobbyist photographer. Making the transition from an amateur photographer to that of a professional photographer is probably the most illusive aspect of being a photographer, and is idolized by a simple term. That term being: “Freelancer”.
Now this can be confusing to many who seem to have the impression that professional photographers are freelance photographers, especially when many professionals claim to be such. So to put it as simply as possible, the main aspects that define the difference between these three are: The type of equipment used, comprehension of photographic technique, style of work, and profitability. The difference between the three types of photographers is what truly sets the status and state of your self and your work.


Amateur Photographers

This is probably the broadest category of photographer, simply because it’s all inclusive of whoever doesn’t fall within the realm of the other two categories. Amateurs include anybody with a point-and-shoot camera and those with excessively low grade SLR cameras, who typically take “party pics”, shoot on a “for fun” basis, or only ever shoot their friends. Many of those who fall under this category are either still learning and/or mastering basic photographic technique or simply don’t care about technique. Probably the absolute most defining aspect of this group is simply that those under its realm do not (and usually cannot) make a living based from photographic endeavors.


If you are using a Point and Shoot Camera like this, You will always be an Amateur. Image by


Professional Photographers

Professional Photographers are the smallest type of photographers, but the most commonly misrepresented. These people have worked hard and show it in not only their mastery of basic photographic techniques, but also in there own independent styles and techniques. Usually people on this level have their own high-end equipment, studios, and private high profile clientele, and maintain their standard of living (and usually well-exceed it) based only on their photographic endeavors.


Professional photographers tend to specialize in a certain aspect of photography such as studio photography. Image by


Freelance Photographers

The in-between class of photographer, those in this group typically suit a large range of clientele, both personal and commercial, and maintain a high quality of equipment to pursue such. This status is typically reached after mastering all basic photographic techniques, and characterized by the in progress development of personal styles and techniques of their own. Freelance photographers usually cannot live well off their income, but can easily supplement it through there photographic endeavors.


Working as a Freelancer can feel like a competition of abilities and wills. Image by

Now you might be wondering why I felt it was necessary to classify and define these three groups, and the answer is simple. There is no mention of artistic ability within any of these classifications. How amazing your photographs are does not define what level your on. I have personally seen a 10 year old pick up a camera and within 10 minutes shoot professional-grade photos. Your ability is your ability, but identifying your standing as a photographer will help teach you what you need to learn and work on to become the professional photographer that you want to be. I only recently transitioned into that of professional photographer after many years of hard work as a freelancer, but most photographers have yet to move on from that of amateur status.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Liked this? Then Please share this page on Twitter (by clicking on the “Tweet” button) and subscribe to get the top stories of the week, plus the most popular reviews delivered straight to your inbox.

And don’t forget to give us your suggestions in the comments!


View the original article here

Nikon V1 verses Canon Powershot G1X

by MatthewBamberg

As the camera companies put more attention to the future they look to the new models with much bigger sensors than any of the point-and-shoots of the past, anywhere from 5-7 times the size of most point-and-shoot models. To be sure this isn’t a totally new thing. Leica has always made these cameras, but they use a different focusing system (Rangefinder), are handmade and cost a fortune. This is good news for photographers of all levels on a lot of fronts. The camera companies had to do something to compete against the exponential expansion cell phone camera use.

It took awhile for the big companies to come around to the trend, a couple of years. In my last article about mirrorless cameras I reported that Panasonic, Olympus, Sony and Samsung were the only companies that made the beasts. Now that Nikon and Canon have jumped on board the trend has solidified. The real question is will this turn out to be a new technology revolution that causes the slow demise of the dSLR.



At last, Canon enters the a new point-and-shoot camera to the market and they’re doing with a bang, introducing the Canon Powershot G1X with a large sensor (13.2mm x 8.8mm) that is bigger than the one on the Nikon V1/J1. In the sensor size category, this gives Canon a one-up on Nikon’s. Caveat of this camera: no interchangeable lenses, making the in-camera lens it does have worth an extra look.

Canon, however is left behind, releasing this camera instead of a mirrorless one like other companies have. Technically as far as I can see a mirrorless camera has to have interchangeable lenses something that Canon’s model does not have and Nikon’s does, therefore the new big-sensored Canon is not of the mirrorless variety. Nikon wins the interchagable lens option round by a big margin.

Both cameras have good lenses with image stabilization. The assortment of lenses for the Nikon V1/J1 (Nikon V1 is pricer) include: 10 mm f/2.8 (27mm equivalent), 10-30mm (27-81mm 35mm equivalent) f/3.5-5.6, 30-110mm (27-81mm 35mm equivalent) f/3.8-f/5, and 10-100mm(27-270mm equivalent) f/4.5-5.5 “power zoom” lens.

The Canon G1X in-camera lens is 15mmX60mm or 28mm – 112mm 35 mm equivalent and f/2.8 to f/5.8 aperture, not a great lens for wide-angle architecture shots, but just fine according to Canon’s press release about it: “Utilizing Ultra high refractive index Aspherical (UA) elements and precision glass moulding technology, the lens achieves both a compact size and pin-sharp clarity for the most discerning of photographers.” (All they’re saying there is that the lens is specially made to reduce spherical and other aberrations.)


Both cameras can produce Raw files, making editing details less comprising for the photo, but have different aspect ratio (the proportions of the size of the image). The Nikon produces a 3:2 ratio, the same as most dSLR cameras. The Nikon, a 4:3 aspect ratio the same as most point and shoots and micro-four-thirds cameras (another type of mirrorless).

There’s a big difference in resolution, too. The Nikon has 10.1 MP and the Canon a 14.3 MP sensor. In terms of picture quality, this leaves the Nikon at a moderate disadvantage. If you weigh its smaller sensor size, which is significantly important for a sharp image at 100 % resolution and its lower resolution, it is a double-whammy signal of a lesser quality picture. The Canon’s bigger sensor and higher resolution is the winner overall. If it only had interchangeable lenses it’d be perfect!


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Liked this? Then Please share this page on Twitter (by clicking on the “Tweet” button) and subscribe to get the top stories of the week, plus the most popular reviews delivered straight to your inbox.

And don’t forget to give us your suggestions in the comments!


View the original article here